RET: another acronym, representing the phrase radical economic transformation.
Some of the interesting things that emerge each year on budget discussions are statistics. Some of these which are disturbing are:
Back to b….: Nudity is back, says Playboy. (Playboy had hardly become famous for its intellectual content. What were they smoking when they covered up?)
Tuks says that it is currently running at a deficit. This is the third major university warning that its current financial trajectory is unsustainable. The only result that can come of this is that changes to teaching style is made or that the quality of the education it offers will suffer. Most of us do not understand that our universities no longer produce top notch graduates. As an example, my son: he was awarded a cum laude honours degree in maths at Stellenbosch, arguably one of our better universities. Before admission into a Masters at Auckland he was forced to do a bridge year to bring him up to standard. Education is indisputably a way out of poverty. However, we have reached the point where we cannot academically compete with the developed world.
Not fair: malt beer is taxed at R4.30 per litre whilst African beer is taxed at 7.8c per litre. To h*ll with other taxes… this calls for a revolt!
Diesel discrimination: cities like Paris, London and Amsterdam have announced that all diesel vehicles will be phased out in the next four years owing to the nitrous oxide fumes that day release. This may well sound the death knell of especially small turbocharged diesel engines.
A self-proclaimed spiritual healer, life coach, reiki and crystal healer is seeking to crowd-fund a spiritual journey around the world to help people see the beautiful potential within themselves, learn self-love and express to soul expression. I believe we should all go.
I was most interested to see that the overseas Barclays shares rose the moment that bank signalled progress in its efforts to divest it of its African unit and sell off unwanted assets; locally it’s shares on the JSE dropped. This, of course, is an indication of how the market sees Absa/Barclays in Africa.
On a similar vein was an 8% rise of Shoprite, and a 4.9% rise of Steinhoff shares when the merger between them was called off. Clearly the market foresaw what Wiese had not.
That erstwhile icon of fashion stores, Stuttaford’s, has gone into business rescue.
Fedhasa has called for our Minister of Finance to remove structural barriers preventing participation of black people in our economy. It calls for the barriers to entry into food and fuel franchises to be dropped. What interested me is what they see as those barriers being: unencumbered cash requirements, a track record and high shopping mall rentals. One wonders how that union proposes to deal with what one would assume to be standard business requirements? After all, if you don’t have the business acumen and deep pockets you will simply not make it.
There was talk, this week past, of the EFF joining hands with the ANC in amending our constitution to provide for the expropriation of land without compensation. There are few who would argue against the unequal distribution of land in South Africa. Nevertheless, taking land without compensation is such a radical step that one trusts that these threats are merely part of the annual posturing that accompanies Sona.
The government plans to spend R 947bn in public sector infrastructure over the next three years. Of this R 63bn will fund public housing.
Nothing much affecting practice came up this week. However, I have a wonderful video of counsel settling a matter on the steps of court. Ask me for a copy
Weggooigoed is jakkalsp..: If I have quite an interesting article by prof Sonnekus (learned to the extent that I generally don’t understand what he’s saying) dealing with throwaway art objects which turns out to have immense value. Ask me for a copy – in Afrikaans.
If a child is brain-damaged after almost drowning in your fish pond, are you liable to pay for the future care of the child? Would your answer to change if those present were warned and knew about the fish pond? In essence, the question is whether there was a legal duty on the house owner to prevent harm to the child concerned and whether the steps taken were reasonable in the circumstances. I hold a very interesting article by Neethling which serves as an excellent exposition of our law of delictual liability on this topic. Ask me for a copy
RET: we are told that without a radical economic transformation our democratic transition towards the vision of a non-racial non-sexist democratic and prosperous society cannot be achieved. I read a write-up on the subject by the SACP second general secretary and found that we agreed on the social issues in South Africa and, indeed many of the suggested solutions. Where we differ is on the reasons for the inequality.
Predictably Manyi, that seemingly ever present apologist for radicalism, has called for Molefe to become our new finance minister, saying that he has the requisite credential skills and so on. Whilst this may be true, he ignores the fact that serious, and, as yet unanswered questions have been asked regarding Molefe’s integrity. The mere fact that he has not been prosecuted does not make him clean; but perhaps this is of no consequence.
We will shortly be filling in tax forms to deal with our most expensive dependant – the government: a few thoughts:
© 2017 TMJ Attorneys - Website by Loud Crowd Media
This website contains general information about legal issues and developments in law. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. They should not be construed as legal advice. Should you require legal advice please contact one of our attorneys directly at the given contact addresses. Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Tomlinson Mnguni James or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm.